<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Oasis for Learning: Posts tagged with: graduate]]></title>
	<link>http://oasis-for-learning.net/group_tag_menu/group/119/graduate?</link>
	<atom:link href="http://oasis-for-learning.net/group_tag_menu/group/119/graduate?" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	 <item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://oasis-for-learning.net/bookmarks/view/224/getting-research-questions-wrong-then-right</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:24:37 -0700</pubDate>
	<link>http://oasis-for-learning.net/bookmarks/view/224/getting-research-questions-wrong-then-right</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Getting research questions wrong - then right]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A nice simple explanation of how to come up with (and not come up with) research questions for a thesis. Distilled from Trowler's book (available cheaply at&nbsp;http://www.amazon.co.uk/Doctoral-Research-Higher-Education-ebook/dp/B007W57J5K )</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://patthomson.wordpress.com/2013/10/03/getting-research-questions-wrong-then-right/" rel="nofollow">http://patthomson.wordpress.com/2013/10/03/getting-research-questions-wrong-then-right/</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jon Dron</dc:creator>
</item>
  <item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://oasis-for-learning.net/bookmarks/view/222/moocs-are-so-unambitious-introducing-the-moophd</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:03:30 -0700</pubDate>
	<link>http://oasis-for-learning.net/bookmarks/view/222/moocs-are-so-unambitious-introducing-the-moophd</link>
	<title><![CDATA[MOOCs are so unambitious: introducing the MOOPhD]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>My article proposing (only very slightly tongue-in-cheek) a massive open online PhD. It goes into some detail about ways this could be done, and the issues that might prevent it from happening. I wrote the article as an exercise to see whether the idea actually makes sense, partly to explore some of the troublesome issues about MOOCs in general, and partly to try to understand what is genuinely distinctive about a PhD process.</p>
<p>I think it <em>does</em> make sense as a supporting process for researchers (not really a course, more of a club) but there are some pretty big barriers and concerns that will make it hard for this kind of thing to replace a traditional PhD. There are some tricky concerns about things like ethics reviews and sustaining motivation, but it's interesting that the biggest barriers have little to do with pedagogy or process, and a lot to do with simpler things like finding a university to examine the thesis, getting access to closed research publications, and finding resources like labs and places to do your research.&nbsp;</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="https://landing.athabascau.ca/blog/view/285554/moocs-are-so-unambitious-introducing-the-moophd" rel="nofollow">https://landing.athabascau.ca/blog/view/285554/moocs-are-so-unambitious-introducing-the-moophd</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jon Dron</dc:creator>
</item>
  <item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://oasis-for-learning.net/bookmarks/view/220/the-daily-phd</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:52:50 -0700</pubDate>
	<link>http://oasis-for-learning.net/bookmarks/view/220/the-daily-phd</link>
	<title><![CDATA[The Daily PhD]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>A useful site that aggregates a lot of news and information about PhDs, the PhD process and related issues.</p><p>Address of the bookmark: <a href="http://thedailyphd.com/#" rel="nofollow">http://thedailyphd.com/#</a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Jon Dron</dc:creator>
</item>
 
</channel>
</rss>