Oasis for Learning: Related items

The Daily PhD

Jon Dron — Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:52:50 -0700

A useful site that aggregates a lot of news and information about PhDs, the PhD process and related issues.

Address of the bookmark: http://thedailyphd.com/#

Surviving a PhD – 10 Top Tips

Jon Dron — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:03:56 -0700

A bunch of motivational tips by Alex Hope, with some useful advice for those struggling with the doctoral learning journey. Tip 10 (ignore tips 1-9) is particularly valuable: the take-home message is that every doctorate (or other large activity in which one learns to research) is different and everyone has different needs, hopes, interests and methods.

The Thesis Whisperer site on which this is featured, at http://thesiswhisperer.com, contains plenty more useful help to those trying to complete a thesis or dissertation.

Address of the bookmark: http://thesiswhisperer.com/2012/07/16/surviving-a-phd-10-top-tips/

MOOCs are so unambitious: introducing the MOOPhD

Jon Dron — Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:03:30 -0700

My article proposing (only very slightly tongue-in-cheek) a massive open online PhD. It goes into some detail about ways this could be done, and the issues that might prevent it from happening. I wrote the article as an exercise to see whether the idea actually makes sense, partly to explore some of the troublesome issues about MOOCs in general, and partly to try to understand what is genuinely distinctive about a PhD process.

I think it does make sense as a supporting process for researchers (not really a course, more of a club) but there are some pretty big barriers and concerns that will make it hard for this kind of thing to replace a traditional PhD. There are some tricky concerns about things like ethics reviews and sustaining motivation, but it's interesting that the biggest barriers have little to do with pedagogy or process, and a lot to do with simpler things like finding a university to examine the thesis, getting access to closed research publications, and finding resources like labs and places to do your research.

Address of the bookmark: https://landing.athabascau.ca/blog/view/285554/moocs-are-so-unambitious-introducing-the-moophd

How not to write a PhD thesis

Jon Dron — Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:35:07 -0700

Great article from the Times Higher Ed giving hints and tips on how not to write a PhD. Good stuff.

Address of the bookmark: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/how-not-to-write-a-phd-thesis/410208.article

The Good Supervisor : Gina Wisker : Palgrave Macmillan

Jon Dron — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:08:25 -0700

Provides help for those wanting to develop strategies for effective supervision with a diversity of students on a wide variety of research projects, whether at postgraduate or undergraduate level. Fully updated second edition includes new content on cultural supervision, online distance supervision, and sustaining research networks.

Address of the bookmark: http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?pid=390385

Noah Gray: Abstract Science

Jon Dron — Thu, 04 Oct 2012 09:28:09 -0700

By Noah Gray, an excellent tutorial in writing scientific abstracts, applicable across social sciences as well as harder science disciplines. Simple, concise and memorable.

Address of the bookmark: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/noah-gray/abstract-science_b_1923214.html

Selecting a (Dissertation) Chair and Committee

Jon Dron — Thu, 09 Jan 2014 13:59:42 -0800

This is a useful article via Tomorrow's Professor for postgraduate students choosing their supervisory team, with a carefully thought-through set of criteria that includes expertise, accessibility, timeliness of feedback, previous success, personality and attitude to methodology. While the focus is on the rather peculiar North American PhD process that involves committees that both help and assess your PhD, chairs rather than lead supervisors found elsewhere, and talks about archaic practices like the tenure system, the principles all apply well across the board. If you've already chosen your team (or had it chosen for you) it might be interesting to see how your supervisor(s) match the criteria. Something that is not particularly highlighted in this article is that you don't always need all of these qualities in a single person. In fact, I think it is sometimes useful to have, say, one supervisor who loves your methodology and one that is sceptical, but it all depends on how you like to work.

Address of the bookmark: http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept-ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/enewsletterWithSurvey.php?msgno=1296